Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Due Friday, February 6th - Introduction Material for "Wit" by Margaret Edson


Cynthia Nixon as Vivian Bearing from Wit by Margaret Edson

Overview: In this unit we will explore the paradoxical presence of complexity and simplicity in our lives.  Cancer is a disease that unfortunalty touches everyone in our society, today.  In her play Wit, Edson explores our need for human kindness.  Today, more than ever, kindness and empathy are values we need to exemplify.

Reading and Study: As a means of introduction, I would like you read, view, and study the following materials.  First, read the background on the play and view the trailer.  Next, read the background and poems by John Donne.  This sonnet is in the play.  Next, read a selection from Beatrix Potter, which again, is in the play.  These two drastically different works balance each other out with simplicity and complexity.  Finally, read the beautifully movie story behind Margaret Edson, who won the highest literary honor the Pulitzer Prize, but decided to continue her life as a Kindergarten teacher in Atlanta.

Written Blog Response: When we completed our introductory study I would like you to compose a 300-500 word blog response covering what you learned about the Margaret Edson, Wit, Holy Sonnet VI and Beatrix Potter. Please include direct evidence from this post. You may also include questions and insights you would like to discuss in class. I look forward to your responses.


About the Play, Wit by Margaret Edson


Wit's main character, Vivian Bearing, is a fifty-year-old renowned literary scholar of John Donne's seventeenth-century metaphysical poetry. The play concerns Bearing's attempts to put her life together as it comes to an end.

By combining concepts of metaphysical poetry and human mortality within the complex mind of a dying scholar, Edson creates an extraordinary character of fortitude and wit. Edson's use of wit, referring to intelligence and wisdom, develops this multilayered work into a play about grace and redemption. An uncompromising look at cancer, the play shows how language has the power both to complicate and to ameliorate understanding. "The play is not about doctors or even cancer. It's about kindness, but it shows arrogance. It's about compassion, but it shows insensitivity," Edson explains. By showing the opposite of kindness, Edson's play effectively leaves the audience "yearning for kindness."  Edson was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1999. 

Edson's teaching career progressed along with the success of her play. Despite her newfound fame as a playwright, she continued teaching elementary school in Washington, D.C.–English as a second language for five years and first grade for one year—until she moved to Atlanta in 1998 and began teaching kindergarten.

Fully dedicated to teaching elementary school in her adopted town of Atlanta, Edson does not intend to write another play. She lives with her partner, Linda Merrill, and their two sons, Timmy and Pete.

Purcell, Kim. "Margaret Edson (b. 1961)." New Georgia Encyclopedia. 04 September 2013. Web. 29 January 2020.



John Donne and his "Holy Sonnet VI"

John Donne's Holy Sonnets are a group of 19 devotional sonnets that take on questions of Christian faith and salvation. Published in 1633 (nearly a decade after Donne's death), the precise order of the sonnets is debated by editors and Donne scholars. As such, the numerical assignment for each poem tends to vary from publication to publication, with scholars working from a number of circulated manuscripts from the period. Because the order of the Holy Sonnets is fundamentally unknown, it is important to approach them largely as individual poems rather than a coherent sequence, despite the fact that scholars have grouped certain sonnets together in a unanimously-acknowledged cohesive progression.


The Holy Sonnets open on a note of resignation as an unnamed speaker announces that he has resigned himself to God in the name of salvation. Anxious about his impending death, the speaker continues to wonder what kind of fate awaits him at the end of his life. Thrilled by the prospect of his soul ascending to heaven, the speaker agonizes over the sins he has committed on earth and begs forgiveness from God, only to express worry over slipping backward again into Satan's grasp.

The speaker continues to wonder whether God will pardon him in the end, and takes solace in the fact that the son of God, Christ, is merciful toward man. But the speaker also begins to contemplate seriously the process of death and the deterioration of his body, ultimately challenging the primacy of the body and refusing to fear death after all. Toggling back and forth between his own voice and the voice of Christ, the speaker imagines what death will feel like, look like, sound like, and be like in the end while also wondering why this type of promised salvation is only available to humanity.

Once the speaker has resigned himself to God, he continues to struggle with the notion of what, exactly, that means. As such, a number of the Holy Sonnets express complex and somewhat shocking relationships between the speaker and God. Asking to be beaten, ravished, and enthralled, the speaker begins to associate the process of religious cleansing with the experience of erotics and violence. The figure of God comes to represent not only the Christian "father" but also the Petrarchan Beloved whom the speaker must flatter and seduce despite his frustrations with how the affair will end.

As Judgment Day continues to approach, the speaker contemplates the relationship between the individual and the collective, imagining that his body is actually its own little world. Concerned with both his own demise and the apocalypse, the speaker continues to wonder what the end of life will look like and how the experience will feel. Noting that a woman he once loved has already died, the speaker becomes dedicated to acquiring God's mercy so that he will be able to join her in heaven. However, as the sonnets come to a close, the speaker is still unsure whether he is practicing the right form of devotion and whether he will be able to continue his pursuit of mercy while living in constant fear of imminent death.

"Holy Sonnet VI"(from the Gardner Ed.)

Death, be not proud, though some have called thee
Mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so,
For those, whom thou think'st thou dost overthrow,
Die not, poor death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
From rest and sleep, which but thy pictures be,
Much pleasure, then from thee much more must flow,
And soonest our best men with thee do go,
Rest of their bones, and soul's deliverie.
Thou'rt slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men,
And dost with poyson, war, and sickness dwell,
And poppy, or charms can make us sleep as well,
And better than thy stroke; why swell'st thou then?
One short sleep past, we wake eternally,
And death shall be no more, Death thou shalt die.


Beatrix Potter and The Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies

The Tale of The Flopsy Bunnies is a children's book written and illustrated by Beatrix Potter, and first published in July 1909. After two full-length tales about rabbits, Potter had grown weary of the subject and was reluctant to write another. She realized however that children most enjoyed her rabbit stories and pictures, and so reached back to characters and plot elements from The Tale of Peter Rabbit (1902) and The Tale of Benjamin Bunny (1904) to create The Flopsy Bunnies. A semi-formal garden of archways and flowerbeds in Wales at the home of her uncle and aunt became the background for the illustrations.


From The Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies by Beatrix Potter

It is said that the effect of eating too much lettuce is “soporific.”

I have never felt sleepy after eating lettuces; but then I am not a rabbit.

They certainly had a very soporific effect upon the Flopsy Bunnies!

When Benjamin Bunny grew up, he married his Cousin Flopsy. They had a large family, and they were very improvident and cheerful.

I do not remember the separate names of their children; they were generally called the “Flopsy Bunnies.”

As there was not always quite enough to eat,—Benjamin used to borrow cabbages from Flopsy’s brother, Peter Rabbit, who kept a nursery garden.

Sometimes Peter Rabbit had no cabbages to spare.

When this happened, the Flopsy Bunnies went across the field to a rubbish heap, in the ditch outside Mr. McGregor’s garden.

Mr. McGregor’s rubbish heap was a mixture. There were jam pots and paper bags, and mountains of chopped grass from the mowing machine (which always tasted oily), and some rotten vegetable marrows and an old boot or two. One day—oh joy!—There were a quantity of overgrown lettuces, which had “shot” into flower.

The Flopsy Bunnies simply stuffed themselves with lettuces. By degrees, one after another, they were overcome with slumber, and lay down in the mown grass.

Benjamin was not so much overcome as his children. Before going to sleep he was sufficiently wide awake to put a paper bag over his head to keep off the flies.

The little Flopsy Bunnies slept delightfully in the warm sun. From the lawn beyond the garden came the distant clacketty sound of the mowing machine. The blue-bottles buzzed about the wall, and a little old mouse picked over the rubbish among the jam pots.


About the Author, Margaret Edson


A Teacher's 'Wit' and Wisdom
by Nelson Pressley, February 27, 2000

The paradox about Margaret Edson, widely celebrated playwright, is that she is not really a playwright. Edson herself has been saying so ever since she became a celebrated playwright last season, when her drama, "Wit," written nearly nine years ago, finally took the theater world by storm.

"Wit," about a stern college professor's battle with cancer, is still running in New York, where it won an armload of awards, including the 1999 Pulitzer Prize for drama. A production opened in Los Angeles last month, with more to come across the country. HBO is planning a film version. And Judith Light is starring in the national touring company, which opens this week at the Kennedy Center's Eisenhower Theater.

Yet despite all this, Edson, who teaches kindergarten at a public school in Atlanta, maintains that it is impossible for her to think of herself as a dramatist.

"I just wrote this one little play," she explains.

This, then, is a story about arguably the most famous kindergarten teacher in America.

On a cold winter night, Edson, 38, stands erect at the front of a conference room in a downtown Washington hotel, charming a few hundred members of the Association of American Colleges and Universities as she lectures on punctuation. The matching of speaker and topic seems sensible: In "Wit," a good deal of philosophy hangs on whether a key phrase in one of John Donne's Holy Sonnets should have a comma or a semicolon. In advertisements, on programs, even on the published play, the spelling of the title includes the semicolon: "W;t."

On Edson's cue, Rosalind Jones, one of her former professors at Smith College, reads from "Wit" with the playwright. Appropriately, Jones plays E.M. Ashford, a former professor of Vivian Bearing, the drama's main character. Edson plays Vivian, a cold, intimidating Donne scholar who has ovarian cancer. Between bouts of what is often brutal (and impersonal, given Vivian's brusque professional methods) medical treatment, Vivian's mind flashes back to scenes like the one Edson and Jones read.

"And death shall be no more, comma," argues Jones as Ashford to a younger Vivian. "Death thou shalt die."

When her role is done, Jones leaves the stage, but Edson keeps reading her own part; she doesn't want the scene to be interrupted by exit applause. This is a lecture, not a theater. What matters now is the lesson.

The next morning Edson, a Washington native, takes the stage of the arts center at Sidwell Friends, where she went to high school in the late 1970s. She talks about Derek Anson Jones, a close friend since their days at Sidwell.

Four days before this, Edson's triumphant return to her alma mater, Jones--who directed the New York and touring versions of "Wit"--died of complications from AIDS. Edson had planned to share the stage with him this morning. Unhappily, she can't, so she stands before the Sidwell crowd and remembers her times with Jones: the way he stole the show from her as Touchstone when she was playing Rosalind in "As You Like It" at Sidwell; the way he optimistically carried the script of the undiscovered "Wit" in his backpack for years as he was building his directing career in New York.

At the end of these sessions (and at the beginnings), Edson gets long, deeply appreciative ovations. Edson, oddly, stands stock still, impervious to the acclaim; she looks as if she's waiting for a bus. This is not what playwrights do. Playwrights bow or smile or wave or blush. Their instinct for dramatic action demands it.

Edson, on the other hand, merely waits--like a teacher--for the room to get quiet.

She'd Rather Teach

Margaret Edson wrote "this one little play" in Washington almost nine years ago. Nothing about her life up till then pointed to dramatic theatrical success.

She grew up across the street from American University; her father, who died in 1977, wrote for newspapers, and her mother continues her career as a social worker. Julia Louis-Dreyfus, later of "Saturday Night Live" and "Seinfeld," lived next door. The two girls would invent dramas with Barbie dolls or act out fantasies of being college girls.

She dabbled in drama at Sidwell, then went to Smith College, majoring in Renaissance history. Not finding herself particularly employable after graduating, she helped a friend move to Indiana, then settled outside Iowa City (where her sister lived) for a summer, selling hot dogs by day and working at night in a bar at the end of a dirt road. Then she went to Rome to live in a French convent for a year.

After Rome, she returned to Washington, landing a job in the cancer ward of a research hospital. Later she worked in publications at the St. Francis Center (now the Wendt Center for Loss and Healing), cranking out grant proposals.

In the summer of 1991, Edson quit her position at St. Francis and got a low-pressure job working in a bike shop near Tenley Circle. In effect, she was taking the summer off so she could write this one little play that had been taking shape in her mind, triggered in part by what she had seen of cancer treatment.

But she would allow herself only the summer to write. She was enrolled at Georgetown University for the fall, ready to pursue a master's in English. She wasn't setting out to become a writer.

"Oh, no," Edson says, horrified by the idea. "That would have been too dangerous for me."

Why does writing seem more dangerous than--

"Than saying, 'Now I'm going to be a waitress?' I don't know. I haven't thought about it." She pauses. "Because if you're a waitress, you're doing something. You're getting up and getting dressed every day and you're part of the world. And if you're a writer, you're just not good for anything. You're not in the mix when you're a writer. It just wouldn't do for me to be a writer."

What she wrote, that one time that she wrote, was rejected from coast to coast. Finally, in January 1995, South Coast Repertory in Costa Mesa, Calif., produced "Wit." Edson says she was surprised at how unsurprising the experience was: "It happened exactly like it was in my mind, as though I was whispering to each person what to do. So instead of being astonished by it, it was . . . correct. That was the most exciting thing--to have it be exactly as I imagined it, to the tiniest detail, and to have strangers bringing that about. It was so proper, so correct, that it was thrilling. I was delirious. And that hasn't gone away."

But she says the production, which won a number of Los Angeles Drama Critics Awards, did not make her think, "Aha, I'm a playwright."

"Because I was a teacher by then," she says. "By the time it was produced, I was in my fourth year. I was really into it."

While she was completing her master's at Georgetown, Edson had begun teaching English as a second language through her church, St. Margaret's Episcopal on Connecticut Avenue.

"I started liking my tutoring more and more," she recalls, "and feeling less and less comfortable in the academy. So at the end of that year, it was clear to me that I wanted to be in the elementary classroom."

She launches into a topic that genuinely excites her: the alternative certification plan started by the D.C. school system eight years ago. She was in the inaugural group of the program, which allows promising people from other professions to begin teaching without first wading through the certification process, which Edson says takes at least a year (full time) to complete. Instead, they start teaching right away, taking certification classes at the same time.

"In inner-city schools," Edson says, "there's about a 40 percent exit rate in the first three years for teachers. Alternative certification programs have a much higher retention rate because people go into it knowing more about it. They're not 21. We were older and sadder and wiser, and had had some kind of experience in the classroom. So I taught ESL for five years, and I never could have done it without this program. It was really the big break of my life."

Moving On

It was Jones, whose years of study and dues-paying were beginning to yield fruit in and around New York in the mid-1990s, who finally got "Wit" produced on the East Coast. Artistic Director Doug Hughes agreed to let Jones direct it at the Long Wharf Theatre in New Haven, Conn., where it opened in October 1997. The play had been rejected for two years even after its success at South Coast Rep. Edson ticks off the reasons listed in her rejection letters: "cast size, subject, too much talk, too academic, too haughty, too unsure of itself, whether it was funny or sad. . . . Now people are scratching their heads about it. But it was unanimous."

The script was cut by an hour at South Coast by Edson (who hated the cuts at the time), dramaturge Jerry Patch and director Martin Benson. "The effect it has now, especially in Derek's production, is of this very fast-swerving drive," she says. "You're brought very quickly over to laughing and then ripped right back into something harrowing--very shocking, in fact. And it happens so quickly and smoothly in his production that it makes me seem like I really know what I'm doing." She laughs.

There is a thick streak of redemption running through "Wit" (and made abundantly clear in its final image) as Vivian Bearing comes to terms with her tough personality, her illness, her isolation and the implications of Donne's poetry. Edson, a Christian, says it's fair to say that she has written a Christian--though certainly not proselytizing--play, yet it is seldom described that way.

"And that's very interesting to me. To me, it's obvious. Duh."

Edson has said repeatedly--for she is invariably asked--that she will not write again until she feels she has something else to say. "If 'Wit' works, it's 'cause it's the one thing that I had in my heart," she insists. "And I'm not going to go and try to crank that up again."

Of course, the pressure of writing a follow-up to "Wit" would be enough to intimidate even more experienced writers.

"I don't think that's what's keeping her from doing it," says Linda Merrill, Edson's longtime partner, by phone from Atlanta. (Merrill, who wrote a number of scholarly art books while at the Freer Gallery for 13 years, is now curator of American art at Atlanta's High Museum of Art.) "She is very wrapped up in her other life, which is her life as a kindergarten teacher. That occupies so much of her thinking and her energy that she doesn't have a lot left over for anything else. So the rest of this is something that's going on somewhere else."

Edson says, "The job I have now, 'people person' doesn't even begin to describe it. I'm with my students every minute of the day--lunch, everything. So the isolated languor of the writer is just really not part of my world." She laughs again, and you can practically hear the relentlessly inquisitive voices of 5-year-olds buzzing in her ear.

Because she has achieved a degree of fame and fortune--and possibly because of the scholarly tone of her play--it confounds people that Edson continues to teach kindergarten. She got a hero's applause, for instance, from the university crowd when she was introduced as the toast of American theater and a public schoolteacher.

"It's a government job," she says later, rolling her eyes in a neat summation of the drab hassles implied by the phrase. "There's nothing heroic about it."

Still, teaching, given her circumstances, strikes people as a heroic choice.

Edson isn't buying it. "Ms. Rivers in the room next door has made the same choice," she says flatly. "Not out of the same number of options. But all my colleagues are doing the same thing I'm doing. People who know me slightly, or who have maybe read about me or heard about me, find it hard to understand. But to people who know me better, it makes perfect sense. They know the ways that I'm . . . odd."

"She loves to draw, for instance," says Merrill, who has known Edson for 20 years dating back to their days at Smith, "but she's not very good at it. They're funny little pictures, so they're just right for kindergartners. She's an excellent mimic--in fact, she used to take mime classes and she can imitate animals in amazing ways. And that's a skill that you wouldn't think she'd have occasion to use.

"Writing is a lonely profession," Merrill adds, "and it was hard for her to write the play. She likes having the immediate response from her students. And if there's something about it that isn't working, she can change it immediately. Whereas writing a play is a long, drawn-out process, and it's a long time before you know whether you've been effective."

Add to that the fact that Edson--a private school product--appears to be one of public education's evangelicals. To be in a public school is "critical" for her, she says. "Completely. The school where I teach is a Title One, free lunch/free breakfast school. My students are people who would be . . . well-served by good education." Her voice is very soft now; she is deeply serious. "I feel very clear about what I'm doing. I'm perfectly sure of the positive impact of what I'm doing. And I'm the only person I know who can say that. Except for the people down the hall, Ms. Rivers next door."

Yet once upon a time she wrote a play, and it became a very big hit. . . .

Edson comes up with an allegory to explain it.

"A friend of ours, in his garden, decided to build a shed. He'd never built anything, and he just got this idea that he was going to build this shed. And so he got all these books and plans, and he poured a foundation. For somebody who'd never built anything to build such a shed was incredible. He worked for the government, came home from work, and worked on this shed. And this was his . . . shed. And I was working on my play. We had the same spirit: that whatever else happens, I'm makin' my shed.

"So now," Edson concludes, "he has his shed. And I have my play."



15 comments:

  1. The trailer of Wit by Margaret Edson seems to be very sad, although it is certainly modern. The trailer just flashed through several sad scenes as the main character suffered through the final stage of cancer. However, the video did not show any characterization of her, so I think it will be really interesting to see how Margaret Edson builds the main character to create a comedic piece of work. Despite this piece of work, I find it very interesting that the author did not then pursue the career of a writer, or dramatist after creating such an incredible drama. Although it did take several years for “Wit” to actually take off, I would think that most people would just continue to write more pieces of work rather than going back to their original job, which in this case for Margaret Edson, is teaching kindergarteners. Even though she originally wrote “Wit” just to send a message to the world, I would think that Edson would try to write more dramas or other forms of literature to get her message out to the world more emphatically. In all fairness to her, it is incredible that she was able to write such a great drama despite the fact that she did very little with literature in her childhood. She spent a little time with her friend Julia Louis-Dreyfus, but there wasn’t anything she committed a lot of time or effort into producing. Instead, she majored in History in college and sold hot dogs over the summer. But I am excited to read this drama after seeing some very positive reviews about it: “You’re brought very quickly over to laughing and then ripped right back into something harrowing -- very shocking, in fact. And it happens so quickly and smoothly in his production that it makes me seem like I really know what I’m doing”. Based on this, “Wit” seems to have a very fast pace, with the story never standing still. I tend to really enjoy those stories, so I am excited to see what it is about.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Margaret Edson considered play-writing, but in spit of the Pulitzer Prize she won for Wit, she turned to teaching kindergarten. This is only because teaching "occupies so much of her thinking and her energy that she doesn't have a lot left over for anything else." Ironically, Wit turned out worth her while, though writing it was "a long, drawn-out process, and it was a long time before" she got any reaction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beatrix Potter's The Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies is straightforward and elaborate at the same time. This passage starts with, "It is said that the effect of eating too much lettuce is 'soporific,'" then explains how the Flopsies are related to the rabbits from Potter's previous books, and where they usually got their food, and then returns to them eating a lot of lettuce and falling asleep as if drunk. Of course, this was intended for children, so it's not supposed to be too complicated. The kids love this one, by the way.

      Delete
    2. Holy Sonnet VI is very fitting for Wit, since Vivian is trying to put her life together now that she's dying, once and for all. "One short sleep past, we wake eternally, And death shall be no more, Death thou shalt die."

      Delete
    3. The protagonist in the sonnet obviously has a nasty criminal record, considering the last remaining item on his bucket list is "pray for mercy." The trailer for wit doesn't cover the main point of the play at all. It only summarizes Vivian's diagnosis, attempted treatment, and death.

      Delete
    4. Sort of reminds me of Blade Runner...
      "...all these moments will be lost...like tears in rain. Time to die."
      "It's too bad she won't live. But then, again, who does?"

      Delete
  3. The trailer of "Wit" in my opinion was very sad and at the same time bland making me feel like this is not a movie or play worth watching. The one scene in particular seen in the trailer that would motivate me to watch the film is when she chose the option to go Code Blue if her heart ever does stop beating. It makes me wonder what her motive was. Was it because her past life had an effect on her decision? Or because she couldn't deal with the pain anymore? Why did she risk a chance of living again? These were the questions running through my mind watching the trailer hoping that if I did watch it, there will be answers. Even though the answers to my questions cannot be exactly answered yet, I can certainly infer what I believe would be the answers. In the play, a Holy Sonnet by John Donne is recited. In the sonnet, there are the lines "One short sleep past, we wake eternally; And death shall be no more; Death, thou shalt die." Maybe she chose the Code Blue because she was tired of running from death. That she wanted to finally rest without struggles and embrace it. That after she closes her eyes for one last time, she can live freely like she once did. After writing "Wit", Margaret Edson seems to have no motivation to further develop and make more plays. She instead wanted to stay a kindergarten teacher and that for some reason makes people really confused. Why wouldn't she continue her career as a play writer some may ask. Maybe because she simply doesn't want to become one. That she loves writing for fun but the pressure, time management, and more to continue writing at a high level may be more than what she wants. She is fine with the way her life is and doesn't want it to change.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The trailer seems much closer to modern movies than what we have seen in the past. It is very modern and also very sad. It showed a very real, graphic and depressing side of cancer that many movies omit. I think it was also interesting how the trailer showed the main character, Vivian Bearing, die as a result of her late stage cancer, preparing the audience for the eventuality of her death. The description of the play mentions that the work grapples with the idea of a literary scholar coming to terms with death, which will be interesting to see played out. Another interesting aspect of Wit is the emphasis on kindness and the contrasts used to strengthen that theme.

    Though the "Holy Sonnet VI"(from the Gardner Ed.) is confusing to read and comprehend, it does connect to the overarching theme of death in Wit and seems to be a fitting piece to incorporate with lines like “And dost with poyson, war, and sickness dwell,” connecting to the main character’s fatal illness.

    As for Edson’s choice to remain an elementary school teacher, I think it’s admirable. Despite the fact that her play took off, she remained true to her passions. Her choice also showed her devotion to the literature itself, as it is clear that she wrote Wit because she believed the work was important, regardless of any fame or success that it granted her.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think it is amazing that Margaret Edson continued to teach her kindergarten students after earning a Pulitzer Prize, the most highly regarded award in literature, for “Wit”. It shows how devoted she was to educating the youth even when she did not need to. It also proves that she wrote “Wit” because she was passionate about the message she intended to send with the literature itself, not the reward and benefits she would receive from writing it. This sort of reminded me of the poets from louder than a bomb, “the point is not the points the point is the poetry”. I thought the trailer for wit was intense. Some scenes seem like they will be both disturbing and heart wrenching and sometimes difficult to watch/read, but I am intrigued. I think often times when the struggle of something as severe as cancer is portrayed in books or movies, it is almost censored in a way. From what I got out of the trailer, I do not think this will be the case with “Wit”. One quote of Vivian Bearing’s that really stuck with me was “there is no stage 5”. It was also interesting to consider concepts like deciding on your own “code status”. I cannot imagine making that decision while being in the ill state that she was.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Margaret Edson’s play Wit seems to be a play in which there are several layers to which everything happens. Almost like in Oscar Wilde as we saw earlier this year, wit played a big part in that particular play. The writer of this play (Margaret Edson) was also a teacher. She fully dedicated herself to teaching kindergarten students. Now it seems that sonnets will tie into this particular play again and John Donne has a sonnet of his own called Holy Sonnet VI. These holy sonnets call into question the Christian faith and salvation. The holy sonnet VI is more sophisticated than the Petrarchan sonnets that we have looked at earlier this year. John Donne must have been looking for a significant way to spice up the simple sonnet a bit in his works. Beatrix Potter wrote the children’s story, the tale of the flopsy bunnies. Along with those she also wrote a lot of rabbit stories in general. Margaret Edson did write the play Wit but overall in her lifestyle, she would rather teach. As I mentioned above, her teaching involves kindergarten students. Overall this is the main material that I gathered about our newest play’s writer, Margaret Edson.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought the trailer for “Wit” was very despairing. Margaret Edison wrote about a topic that touches the heart of so many families, cancer and the frailty of life. However, although the concept is very interesting, the trailer did not deliver. It was more of a summary of the film rather than a glimpse to catch the audience. Beginning with the prognosis, and continuing with her life in the hospital where our protagonist undergoes chemotherapy. The pain and suffering she must endure before making a life ending decision of no code. Why did the doctor call a Code Blue? Was there a relationship between Vivian Bearing and that doctor? And what is the importance of the title “Wit”? These are some questions that were on my mind. In the play, a Holy Sonnet by John Donne is recited. “One short sleep past, we wake eternally, And death shall be no more, Death thou shalt die.” These two lines of Holy Sonnet VI piqued my interest because they may be referring to Vivian Bearing’s death in the play/film. How she dies in her sleep, letting go of life and conceding to death with no code. Beatrix Potters’ work also appears in the play. It is much simpler which contrasts the complexity of the Holy Sonnets. In The Tale of the Flopsy Bunnies, it is mentioned that “eating too much lettuce is sporadic.” I’m not sure how this relates to the play, but I have a guess that the simplicity of relaxing in the hospital bed is connected with bunnies eating lettuce and falling asleep. Edson chose to continue teaching elementary school after her success as a playwright. I think she wrote the play because she felt that the themes were important, even if it may have not been so successful.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think it is amazing that Margaret Edison continued to teach her kindergarten students after earning a Pulitzer Prize, in literature, for “Wit”. It shows how devoted she was to educating the youth even when she did not need to. It also proves that she wrote “Wit” because she was passionate about the message she intended to send with the literature itself, not the reward and benefits she would receive from writing it. I would have expected her to do her own writing and not come back to teach. "It's about compassion, but it shows insensitivity," said Edison. I thought the trailer for wit was intense. Some scenes seem like they will be both disturbing and sometimes difficult to watch/read, but I am intrigued and curious. When the struggle of something as severe as cancer is portrayed or talked about in books or movies, it is hard to talk about because it is hard to express to millions of readers/watchers. From what I got out of the trailer, I think this will be the case with “Wit”. One quote of Vivian Bearing’s was “there is no stage 5”. It was interesting about the idea of counting down your life. I cannot imagine making that decision while being in the hospital on a bed very ill like she did. It would scare me and make me more stressed than I already would be.

    ReplyDelete
  9. With Margret Edson, although I’ve read a little bit of Wit during class, I can already tell how thorough everything is thought out in the first exchanges between Vivian and Kelekian. So far, I think Vivian is a wonderful character because of how she uses her sarcasm to examine her past situations that were supposed to be devastating and unbelievable for a woman of her lifestyle. It’s entertaining to watch how Vivian’s comic relief and the seriousness of Kelekian play out between each other in the first scene. But besides the future comic reliefs that may happen in the play, I do think that Edson makes a great point in that even during these times of hardship and struggle, especially for someone whose life will inevitably end, it’s not meant to be sad and serious all the time and that we can have those bittersweet moments of having those last laughable moments near the end of our life and know that they’ve their best life and their bodies did the best they could to live out the life someone wanted. Even in the play, Edson did a great job of putting and mentioning the Holy Sonnet VI through Vivian. You can definitely see how at some point of the play, Vivian kind of becomes entitled to her own meaning of death and how she perceived it (as she would considering her predicament) but was able to learn and be lectured on her own once she was in a state where her life wasn’t a choice anymore. It’s an interesting paradox to identify in a modern playwright, which makes Edson’s play the more likeable.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Because Margaret Edison talks about something that relates so closely to most people the play seems to be more real and touches the heart in a different way. The play talks about cancer and how short and meaningful life is which sort of gives it a gloomy vibe. As it begins with the diagnosis and gives us a glimpse of her life in a hospital undergoing chemotherapy. It brings us through the pain and suffering she has to go through and what was going on through her head as she makes decisions that decide whether she lives or dies. We see many examples of the many layers and meaning Margaret Edison has behind her text. There is also a sonnet by John Donne called “Holy Sonnet VI” that may be interpreted as questioning religion and people’s faith. The trailer showed us the darker side of cancer that many other movies and life experiences may not show us, bringing us closer to the mind of a patient actually undergoing treatment and suffering through the dreadful disease.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It is very inspirational to me how Margaret Edison continued to following her dreams of being a kindergarten teacher even after winning one of the highest ranked awards a author can receive. This may cause some confusion in most of the people that hear about this but to me i think i am somewhat able to respect it. Margaret Edison never wanted to have the fame and fortune which is something not many people are able to ignore. Margaret Edison simply wanted to express her feelings and beautiful story she had created in her play "Wit". After this she was able to step out of the spotlight and live a normal life as a kindergarten teacher like she always wanted. After watching the trailer of wit it seems to be spoiled very heavily and gives me very little motivation to watch the movie. Unless the movie is purposely tricking the viewer, it seems like the ultimate ending of the movie is revealed when she does not choose code blue and decides to die. Somehow i still want to see the movie Wit, just because i want to see more of what she was going through in her hospital bed, I cant even begin to fathom what its like to literally choose your own death and im sure there is very emotional parts of the movie like there was in the trailer.

    ReplyDelete